Visite o site do Enscer - Ensinando o Cérebro!

The Neurodynamics of an Election (Pdf click here)

F. T. Rocha*, E. Massad, A. F. Rocha and M.N. Burattini
Medical Informatics, University of São Paulo, Brazil *fabio@enscer.com.br

Results

Considering only the Possible/Certain votes, our poll opinion disclosed equilibrium between the Yes and No votes (Intention), similar to that published by the Brazilian pollster Ibope on October 16.

However, 13% of the volunteers provided a second opinion showing that they could change their mind in the Election Day. Taking this into account, the final result would be No=67% and Yes=33% (Expected voting), very similar to the actual result of the election (Actual vote).

This was mainly due to a possible migration of the Certainly-not-Yes vote to a No vote signaled in the second opinion (R). This result was not forecasted by any of the polls published before the election, even in the one of October 21, estimating No=53% and Yes=45%.